🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for AI Training

Observers said the seeming leak could boost AI companies looking for material to train their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated data is sadly common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own personal free version of the service”. The executive said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has become a battleground between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.